It took 1.5 to 2 miles on each run before I began to feel comfortable. This feeling of unbalance became more evident the longer I ran. If the heel were lower to the ground, giving a more grounded feel and platform, it would help provide more support and stability. This was mostly due to the height of the heel. The Dynamic support of the sole unit which i felt more closer to the heel felt unbalanced. It took my feet 1.5 miles to truly feel comfortable in them. My first run out of the box was a relaxed 3.5 miles. The upper – recently updated on this model – felt plush with plenty of room for my foot to move. When I slipped them on for the first time I was surprised by how firm they felt. I was intrigued by the flyknit lacing system. The inside of the foot lacks a swoosh, which is more visually appealing. The heel became my favorite part of the design because of how it flashed while on a run. The navy blue mixes well with the orange-peel swoosh and the crimson flash heel. Upon opening the box, I was extremely impressed with the colorway and design of the shoe. Those models run anywhere from 110 to 130, while the Zoom Structure are right in the middle with a price tag of 120. The ride of the Zoom Structures is comparable in stability and cushion to an Asics 2000 or the aforementioned Brooks Ravenna. I found the cushioning and stability similar to that of a Saucony Guide rather than an Omni, or a Brooks Ravenna more than an Adrenaline. The Zoom Structures has many competitors in terms of price, ride and stability. While the Odyssey is build for performance stability, the Zoom Structure are build to be a daily trainer. The Nike Zoom Structure are one of two stability options Nike offers. So when given the chance to review a pair I decided it was time. Nike isn’t the first brand I associate with running. In all my years, I have never ran in a pair of Nikes.
0 kommentar(er)
